The Contract Dilemma
Your team is growing. Your cloud usage is increasing. Google Cloud gives you two main options:
-
Pay-as-you-go — freedom, flexibility, but unpredictable costs.
-
Commitment plans — discounted rates for 1- or 3-year contracts, but a locked-in subscription.
Pick wrong, and suddenly your “budget-friendly cloud” turns into a recurring drain on your finances.
Pay-As-You-Go: Freedom With a Price
The appeal is obvious:
-
No long-term commitment.
-
Easy to scale up or down.
-
Only pay for what you use.
Sounds perfect—until usage spikes unexpectedly. One ML experiment or one traffic surge, and your flexible plan becomes shockingly expensive.
Commitment Plans: Discounted But Locked
Commitment plans reward predictability:
-
Discounts up to 57% on certain VM types.
-
Predictable monthly costs.
-
Best for steady, long-term workloads.
The risk? If your workload drops or shifts, you’re still paying for resources you may not need.
How to Decide What Saves More
1. Model Your Workload
-
Stable workloads: Commitment plans almost always save money.
-
Unpredictable workloads: Pay-as-you-go offers flexibility without waste.
2. Use the Pricing Calculator
Simulate both models based on projected monthly usage. Include potential spikes to see where costs diverge.
3. Factor in Growth & Change
Are you expecting new products, campaigns, or expansions? Forecasting growth can make a commitment plan cheaper long-term.
4. Mix & Match
Some companies use a hybrid approach: commitment plans for core workloads and pay-as-you-go for experiments or burst traffic.
Bottom Line
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. But the principle is simple: predictable workloads benefit from commitments; flexible workloads benefit from pay-as-you-go.
The real savings come from understanding your usage patterns, running simulations, and monitoring constantly. Ignore this, and even “cheap cloud” can drain thousands per month.
No comments:
Post a Comment